Full review
Longer notes from the same comments we summarized above.
What people reported
Some owners found the riding experience to be "a great experience" and felt it offered "Better feelings than with my TREK Madone." The newer knobs and adjustments are considered "great upgrades." Some users found the height adjustability to be "perfect."
Problems people mention
A significant complaint is thigh rub, which some found to be a "clear no-go" and a design flaw. Owners reported issues with power data, specifically "overzealous smoothing" and delays in feedback that caused overshooting in erg mode. One user mentioned their "resistance kept coming on and off," making it hard to maintain constant pedal pressure. The seat is described as "horrendous" by at least one user. Some expressed general disappointment, calling it "so bad" compared to earlier Tacx trainers and "an inferior product vs gen 1" of smart bikes. There's also a general sentiment that Garmin, as the parent company, has become "annoying" with new product releases and pricing strategies, which extends to this bike.
Where owners disagree
Owners disagree sharply on the overall experience: some call it "a great experience" while others say they "have nothing good to say about it." This suggests a potentially inconsistent user experience or varying expectations.
Who it's for
There is limited specific evidence to clearly define the target audience. However, it seems geared towards cyclists looking for a high-end indoor training solution, especially those who prefer the Tacx ecosystem or are considering a smart bike alternative to a smart trainer. Potential buyers should be aware of the reported design and performance inconsistencies.
